![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
I think I have this figured out now.
In 1990, someone wrote a Real Ghostbusters fan fiction called "Breathless Anticipation", in which Peter is hospitalized and hooked up to a breathing machine because he's cursed by a ghost that steals his breath. This triggered the feels of other ladies who, at the time, were in their 30s, and so THEY glomped onto this story and started writing their own tearjerker stories where Peter is hospitalized and injured and sick. They weren't fans of the source material (a few of them I've talked to refuse to touch the show itself), they were only fans of THAT FIC. The story could have been about the Sentinel, or Star Trek, or My Little Pony or the Muppet Babies, and the result would have been the same. Only these ladies insist on calling themselves a "fandom" of Real Ghostbusters.
Uh, no. Refusing the canon material, refusing to watch the show, eschewing how the characters were intended to be, acknowledging fan fiction only, and reimagining things from the ground up to tailor to your ideas isn't being a fan of something. I'm not exactly sure WHAT'S that called, but it sure as heck isn't fandom.
But that's just me. What do you guys think? What, to you, defines being a fan of something?
In 1990, someone wrote a Real Ghostbusters fan fiction called "Breathless Anticipation", in which Peter is hospitalized and hooked up to a breathing machine because he's cursed by a ghost that steals his breath. This triggered the feels of other ladies who, at the time, were in their 30s, and so THEY glomped onto this story and started writing their own tearjerker stories where Peter is hospitalized and injured and sick. They weren't fans of the source material (a few of them I've talked to refuse to touch the show itself), they were only fans of THAT FIC. The story could have been about the Sentinel, or Star Trek, or My Little Pony or the Muppet Babies, and the result would have been the same. Only these ladies insist on calling themselves a "fandom" of Real Ghostbusters.
Uh, no. Refusing the canon material, refusing to watch the show, eschewing how the characters were intended to be, acknowledging fan fiction only, and reimagining things from the ground up to tailor to your ideas isn't being a fan of something. I'm not exactly sure WHAT'S that called, but it sure as heck isn't fandom.
But that's just me. What do you guys think? What, to you, defines being a fan of something?
no subject
Date: 2014-08-12 12:23 am (UTC)From:Ghostbusters, falling under sci-fi comedy with all its technobabble and the technology attached to it as well as the humour of it all, kind of needs that stuff on top of correct characterization to work in fan fic. Now, fic with darker themes can work as well, since we're talking about a theme of paranormal investigators. Most of the slice-of-life fan story will include mentions of equipment upkeep or monitoring and/or talk of the paranormal, even in passing. On top of that, if it's Real Ghostbusters-based, there will usually be at least a short appearance by Slimer. As long as fan fic writers realize that their work is not going to please everybody, they can write what they will, but at the same time, they shouldn't blow a fuse when people call them out on not giving a damn about the source material. ;)
I just remembered, back in my Lord of the Rings fandom days, that there was a whole faction of fic writers who were called "Frodo Healers" who basically solely wrote fan fiction in which Frodo was ill (anything from regular viruses to food poisoning, and I am not joking) or injured and had to be taken care of. Usually, it was set between his childhood and his 33rd birthday, but sometimes, post-War of the Ring, but pre-Grey Havens, since Frodo always remained touched by the Black Breath. There were scores of that stuff online, and holy shit was it ever bad!
no subject
Date: 2014-08-12 01:22 am (UTC)From:Anyway, the younger one, Blair, has been coddled and smarmed over, and looked after by all these fangirls to the point where his HEARTBEAT is a sentient thing. It's really weird. I think if anyone ever did that with Peter, I'd have to start beating people with their own word processors.
As it is, I had someone get in my face at Mediawest because I said that Peter was a cartoon character. Thing is...HE IS! And the beauty of RGB is that the premise and such were lax enough so that Peter could do cartoony things like break the fourth wall or have his eyes bug out like a Tex Avery character. He was pretty much Pinkie Pie's forerunner in that respect.
no subject
Date: 2014-08-12 02:49 am (UTC)From:Oh my...
Okay, what, someone got upset because RGB!Peter is a cartoon character? Really? Wow, someone needs a reality check (not you, dear, THEM!). Even movie-verse Peter is a movie character, they aren't real (but I love stumbling upon Twitter and Tumbler RP accounts of the guys, oh, my it's so much fun!), and they do fictional character things, whether animated or not. In the words of one Dr. Ray Stantz: WOW!
no subject
Date: 2014-08-12 02:56 am (UTC)From:I've been all 4 Movie GBs on Twitter though. They're hilarious!!
no subject
Date: 2014-08-12 03:05 am (UTC)From:I also follow @BillMurray which does state it's a parody account, but whoever is behind it is hilarious, and I love it!